Friday, January 27, 2006

In response the biggest Bushie i know

He sent me this link and attempted to call me out as some lover of Iranian nuke development:

From: Names Deleted to protect the ignorant
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 21:19
To: Me and some other friends
Subject: How about you guys?
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/821b8e1c-8f47-11da-b430-0000779e2340.html
Or do you support letting them have nukes? Where do you stand? There's no room
for nuance. It's one or the other

.
Here is my response, in typical fashion because it's so damn easy the Bushies attempt to be cute provides the opening to point out that this is Bush's mess:


Geez, if Bush had not blown his military wad on Iraq, he might actually be in a
position to do something other than ask the Russians to take the lead. (funny
despots working with despots).


As I've told you a thousand times, Iran has a HUGE secular pro-west faction. The WORST THING Bush could do would be to invade or some other military dumb shit. It would turn those friendly to us, against us.

But, hey that Bush foreign policy is working wonders in the
middle east isn't it? Since Bush took over, two radical groups have been
democratically elected in the region, in Iran and now you've got Hamas running
Palestine.


And like I said before the Iraq debacle, if they have nukes or WMD, Israel will take care of it. Especially now, since Bush's foreign policy incompetence put Hamas in power, which will give rise to Netanyahu in Israel and that crazy bastard's going to bomb everyone.

Looks like Bush blew it. AGAIN


Oh, yeah and Osama Bin Laden is still alive, while the Taliban controls
most of Afghanistan. Well played George.

May be time to raise the terror level.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

Remember when Republicans used to talk about Fiscal Responsibility

http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/26/news/economy/cbo.reut/index.htm?cnn=yes

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. budget deficit will hit $337 billion this year, the Congressional Budget Office said Thursday, according to a source familiar with the forecast.
The forecast does not include a potential $80 billion to $100 billion in additional funds the Bush administration might request to finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or more money that likely will be needed this year for Gulf Coast hurricane rebuilding.

Friday, January 13, 2006

More Bush incompetence

Bush implements a “new and improved” prescription drug plan supposed to help seniors get their meds and the opposite happens.

Is there anything this administration doesn’t screw up? Anything? …Anything at all?

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/14/nyregion/14drugs.html

Pathetic

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

LedDale

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft06/news/story?id=2287645&campaign=rss
&source=ESPNHeadlines


If LenDale White did not play on the same team with Bush and Lienhart more people would be talking about awesome he is. He had 26 TDs this year, led the nation, which makes his season the quietest for a scoring leader that I remember.

He averaged over 5 yds/carry for his career and with 541 carries in 3 years he NEVER lost a fumble (according to his stats on ESPN). I'd take him in the top 3.

Bush is costing this guy money. I love me some Reggie, but LenDale totally got overshadowed.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

can any member of the GOP stay within the law?

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060110.wterminator0110/BNStory/International/

First is was smoking Cuban Cigars (something a lot of people who rant about hating Cuba seem to do) and now he can't even obey the laws he's taken an oath to uphold. Shameful.

Typical of the GOP of George Bush though.

Incompetent AND a common criminal

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060110.wterminator0110/BNStory/International/

First is was smoking Cuban Cigars (something a lot of people who rant about hating Cuba seem to do) and now he can’t even obey the laws he’s taken an oath to uphold. Shameful. Typical of the GOP of George Bush though.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

ah, duh?

I would think anyone who has read the Constitution would know that you can't survielle people without a warrant. ANd in case you weren't sure, you could look at the FISA law that was enacted because Mr. Nixon was apparently unclear on the COnstituion so Congress future presidents.

And considering that FISA warrants are more or less a rubber stamp when requested (99%+ approvals within hours), Bush's excuses for his criminal actions just don't pass the smell test.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

This is an old one

I meant to post this some week's ago, but apparently it didn't post: So, here it is


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10530417/from/RS.3/

This is pathetic. He could barely care about outing a secret agent and blowing every contact that she's ever had, putting dozens of peoples lives in jeopardy, but he's going to get uppity about his own breaking of the law when it is exposed. It's not even like it's hard to get a warrant under the FISA rules. In fact 99%+ of all secret warrants are granted in a matter of hours. So, his justifications for breaking the law are simply lies.

Additionally, to pretend like people don't know that their conservations can be tapped is ridiculous, the secret warrants are well-known. It's the lack of oversight (which has led to abuses) that is shameful and it will join the Alien and Sedition Acts and Wilson's despotic stifling of free speech as a low point in American Presidential abuses.

So good to be back

It would appear that the corruption and depravity that is the current incarnation of the GOP is going to see the light of day. While I'm no Republican, here's to hoping that the GOP is taken away from the amoral Bushies and returned to moderates or even true Conservatives (think Goldwater)