Scalia won't recuse himself...

And then there is the 1994 case of Liteky v. United States, in which the Supreme Court ruling noted:


Subsection (a), the provision at issue here, was an entirely new "catch-all" recusal provision, covering both "interest or relationship" and "bias or prejudice" grounds, see Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988) - but requiring them all to be evaluated on an objective basis, so that what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice, but its appearance. Quite simply and quite universally, recusal was required whenever "impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Writing those words for the majority in that case was … Antonin Scalia.


Thanks to www.dailykos.com